Showing posts with label Lesson Plans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lesson Plans. Show all posts

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Writing Horrors

Paranormal Paragraphs
and Other
Writing Horrors


A Fantastic Writer’s Workshop for 
Grade 12 Urban Language Arts Learners

Writing can be a scary thing for many students. Luckily, this creepy workshop is designed to relax the fears of the reluctant writer. During the spine-tingling two-week language arts unit, students find their voice through a focus on fiendish horror and fantasy short stories. In mini-lessons and micro-lectures, students also learn how to avoid the most common horrible writing habits and ghastly grammar mistakes.

The flexible daily activities of the workshop may include Writing Time, Sharing Time, Status Check-Ins and Mini-Lessons as needed.  Scheduling and instructional focus should be shaped by the process – as student needs and questions arise. Although this unit learning plan includes some specific mini-lessons and activities, they are entirely optional. Consider it to be the mere skeleton of a unit plan.

Workshops can be a monster for teachers to manage since students are working independently on different things at different times. Still, in using the recursive writing process – prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, publishing – learners will be able to chop up the daunting task of short story writing into manageable parts and concentrate on producing fantastic material.

The final stage, publishing and sharing stories in a group Read-Around, ensures that workshop participants have an audience. Deepening their ongoing understanding of the “Six-Traits Plus One” writing framework, learners will also have opportunities to coach each other through various stages of the process. This peer-editing places further emphasis on audience while fostering collaboration during the often intimidating and scary revision phase.



In this unit, learners will:

  • Examine and explore the characteristics of horror and fantasy literature;
     
  • Read and listen to scary short stories;
     
  • Create a fantasy plot and write a descriptive short story;
     
  • Investigate writing conventions and common writing errors;
     
  • Self-evaluate writing and peer-edit using the “Six-Trait” framework.



Instructional Strategies:
The central strategy of this learning plan is the Process Writing approach – as defined by Richard Badger and Goodith White (“A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing,” ELT Journal 54-2, 2000) – and described in the Annenberg Learner Writing Workshop series: “Write in the Middle.”

[http://www.learner.org/workshops/middlewriting/prog1.html]

Learners are guided to give feedback using the language of the “Six-Traits Plus One” writing framework.

Lesson planning and handout ideas from:

Velvet McReynolds’ PATS peer-editing strategy outlined in “Write in the Middle”
[http://www.learner.org/workshops/middlewriting/prog7.html]

Marissa Marler – “Creating Your Own Fantasy Story” [http://www.lessonplanspage.com/lacreatingafantasystory612-htm] 

Karen Luchner – “Using Scary Stories to Motivate Students to Read” [http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/thrills-chills-using-scary-407.html?tab=4#tabs]




Big Idea: Conventions

[Adjusting use of conventions, structure and vocabulary to effectively communicate a particular mood or style.]



 







Duration
: ten, 50-minute sessions

Learners: A group of 21 mixed ability students from widely diverse cultural backgrounds, mainly Hmong, Black, White and Mexican American. (The group has theoretically had previous instruction on “Six-Traits Plus One” and the general workshop process.)

Materials – Unit Plan Forms: 13 Dreadful Writing Mistakes handout; Fantastic Plots handout; Scary Story Traits; Goosebumps article; Write a Scary Story handout; Horrible Paragraphs; Paranormal Paragraphs; Writing Rubric; Six-Traits Self-Evaluation Checklist; PATS - Peer-Edit Checklist; Writing Conventions Quiz; (3 or 4) selected stories from – Queen of the Cold-Blooded Tales, Stories by Roberta Simpson Brown – instructor’s choice, but three of the best are Whispers, Sleeping Bags and The Wake-Up Call.

Resources / Websites: Goosebumps article online
[http://www.scholastic.ca/goosebumps/books/stine/writeown.htm]




 
Writing Horrors
Core Learning Strategy Map


Writing Standard: 12. 7. 3.
– Write narratives and other creative texts to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.

Benchmark C. – Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole and build toward a particular tone and outcome (e.g., a sense of mystery, suspense, growth, or resolution).


Core Objective: I can draft and craft a short story in the fantasy fiction genre.

Learning Target: I can identify the traits of a mysterious, suspenseful or frightening story.
Learning Assessment: mini-lessons, readings, discussions
Learning Target: I can use the writing process to revise a text for clarity and tone.
Learning Assessment: mini-conferences, peer-editing

Core Assessment: Fantasy Horror Short Story - 80%;



Language Standard: 12. 11. 1.
– Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.

Benchmark A.    – Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested.

Core Objective: I can recognize standard and nonstandard use of writing conventions.

Learning Target: I can distinguish standard from nonstandard writing conventions.
Learning Assessment: observation, discussions, mini-lessons

Core Assessment: Writing Conventions Quiz - 20%


Success Opportunity for Urban Learners – SOUL Focus:
Production and Distribution of Writing




"I try to create sympathy for my characters, then turn the monsters loose." 

~ Stephen King


Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Digital Writing Workshop


      Troy Hicks

Digital Writing, Digital Teaching





There's no such thing as a free lunch.

digitalwritingworkshop.ning.com



Troy Hicks' NING.com site is offline -- probably because the site started charging money. The lesson here -- and it's a very important one: if you are not using your own site with your own domain, you are not in control. None of these so-called "free" third-party sites are adequate on their own because users are at the mercy of the web host. Sites like NING.com are fine to use as webware but they must be housed at a secure server. Google (Docs and Blogger) are free and of course very stable, but things change quickly -- so "free" is a relative term. You must own the digital content in order to manipulate it and preserve it The cost of a protected domain name and server space is minimal, and, importantly, it allows for maximum control over what web page content is private -- and what content can be scanned, read and repeated by search engines.

Troy Hicks Wiki
digitalwritingworkshop.wikispaces.com

Hicks' Twitter account is @hickstro



International Society for Technology Education
National Educational Technology Standards
http://www.iste.org/standards.aspx


NETS-S Implementation Wiki
http://nets-implementation.iste.wikispaces.net/


What happens in the writing workshop when
we introduce digital writing tools and processes?



The Workshop

Teacher researchers such as Donald Graves, Donald Murray, Lucy Calkins, Nancie Atwell, Katie Wood Ray, Jim Burke, Ralph Fletcher, and Penny Kittle -- among the countless numbers of us who have employed their ideas in our own classrooms -- have developed the writing workshop into a theoretically sound and pedagogically useful model for teaching writing.

While we each can and should make our own list of particular ideas about what constitutes the philosophy of the writing workshop in our own classroom, I feel that we can generally agree that it relies on a core set of principles that center on students as writers, where we “teach the writer, not the writing” (Calkins 1994), as many of the aforementioned authors would remind us. There are a number of core principles that proponents of the writing workshop approach advocate, and I offer my summary of them here:


  • student choice about topic and genre active revision (constant feedback between peer and teacher)
  • author’s craft as a basis for instruction (through minilessons and conferences)
  • publication beyond classroom walls
  • broad visions of assessment that include both process and product




Blogging and BookMarking

We have learned from our writing workshop mentors that inquiry and choice drive the workshop approach. With RSS and social bookmarking as ways to share and gather information, students’ individual choices are highly malleable, and students can easily add to and subtract from their interests.

With a blog, their writing is archived and searchable, open for comments, and ready for presentation in a final portfolio. Combined, the ability to capture, share, and write about information through RSS, social bookmarking, and blogging provides students in the digital writing workshop an opportunity to write, revise, and reflect on their work in ways not possible with spiral-bound notebooks or even word-processing documents alone.

Once students understand the basics of blogging, they can begin to use blogs and two additional tools of the read/write web—wikis and collaborative word processors—to engage in productive writing and conferring practices.

BookMarkers:

Scribefire
http://www.scribefire.com/
Site is updating. Not needed or recommended.


Zotero.org
http://www.zotero.org/
Fine for what it is. Not needed or recommended.

Social Bookmarking

http://www.diigo.com/
http://clipmarks.com/
http://delicious.com/





Weblogs and Wikis

EduCause
7 Things You Should Know About Blogs
http://www.educause.edu/ELI/7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutBlogs/156809



Common Craft
How Blogs Work
http://www.commoncraft.com/video/blogs


EduBlogs
http://edublogs.org/

Class BlogMeister
http://classblogmeister.com/

ThinkQuest
http://www.thinkquest.org/en/




Each of these pages offers general lists of wikis that educators have created and are using in a variety of ways:

Educational Wikis
http://educationalwikis.wikispaces.com/
Free Wiki Spaces
http://www.wikispaces.com/


Thursday, March 29, 2012

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Reading the World


Critical Media Literacy


An Urban Middle School 
Communication Arts Unit Learning Plan




"All the world’s a stage,” noted Shakespeare. But, the men and women are not merely players. They are the directors, designers and producers as well. In this two-week, techno-connected communication arts unit, seventh grade urban learners plug into core concepts of media literacy and expand their understanding of popular media texts. They consider their multiple roles in the media world as both consumers and producers. Learners link to a strategy for critically approaching any type of media text. Through a focus on reflection and reflective thinking, students also develop awareness of a dynamic that makes popular media seem to sometimes shape and influence our world, and sometimes simply hold, as 'twere, the mirror up to nature.”


In this unit, learners will:

     Examine and explore a five-component strategy for reading media texts;

     Interpret their thoughts about text in various forms of mass media;

     Discuss and define critical media literacy;

     Create a personal web splash page and descriptive blog essay;

     Reflect on the nature of reflection.


Although Reading the World constitutes a discrete, two-week unit -- it is conceived as the first part of a two-part series. This critical media literacy learning unit is designed to build background and skills, and then launch learners into a critical cultural literacy unit – a week-long writer’s workshop based on the “Reading Without Words” lesson concept in Linda Christensen’s Teaching for Joy and Justice.


Instructional Strategies: The central strategy of this learning plan uses information and ideas found online at the Center for Media Literacy (CML). The mix of mirror exercises are based on various Viola Spolin improvisation games.

Duration: ten, 50-minute sessions

Learners: A group of 21 mixed ability students from widely diverse cultural backgrounds, mainly Hmong, Black, White and Mexican American. (The group has theoretically had previous instruction on webware and experience with the websites.)



 
Reading the World
Core Learning Strategy Map


Standard: 7. 9. 7.  Critically analyze information found in electronic, print, and mass media and use a variety of these sources.

Core Objective: I can evaluate media with regard to bias, stereotype and message.

Learning Target: I can identify and describe five core concepts of critical media literacy.
Learning Assessment: media literacy reviews, pair-share handout
Learning Target: I can identify critical reflection and other types of reflective thinking.
Learning Assessment: discussion, quick-write
Learning Target: I can reflect on cultural stereotyping and social bias in the media.
Learning Assessment: discussion, critical reading exercises, media analysis games

Core Assessment: Media Literacy Quiz - 50%;



Standard: 7. 9. 8.  Communicate using traditional or digital multimedia formats and digital writing and publishing for a specific purpose.

Core Objective: I can publish my work on the web and share it with the world.

Learning Target: I can reflect my ideas through web texts.
Learning Assessment: essay and splash page composition process

Core Assessment: Published Bio Blog pages presentation - 50%

Assessment Description: Learners will construct a personal web page design and publish a biographical blog essay decoding the design choices.



ISTE NETS (National Educational Technology Standards) addressed:

Standard 1 - Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology

Standard 5 - Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology



Success Opportunity for Urban LearnersSOUL Focus:
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, Production and Distribution of Writing





Reading the World
Unit Learning Plan Overview

Big Idea: Critical Reflection (analyzing, reconsidering and questioning experiences within a broad context of cultural issues)

Essential Questions:

  • How does reading and literacy relate to the media? 
  • How is my culture and community reflected in the media? 
  • How does the media influence my reading of myself?'
  • What are social benefits and drawbacks to pop media? 
  • What is meant by critical reading and critical literacy? 
  • How do I feel about mass media? 
  • What is reflective thinking? 
  • When and why do we reflect? 
  • How does the media influence our view of society? 
  • Does mass media make and manipulate our society – or simply mirror it?


Daily Lesson Plan

Lesson 1 – Critical Reading
o   Intro to critical media literacy / paintings as text
 Lesson 2 – Reflective Reading
o   Mirrors and the nature of reflection / vintage ads as text
Lesson 3 – Five Key Questions
o   reflect on personality traits / 5 Key Qs – magazines as text
Lesson 4 – Me, Myself and Media
o   Branding and Identity / start Bio splash page / 5 Key Qs
Lesson 5 – Same Show, Different Audience
o   Silent Film game / 5 Key Qs review / finish splash page
 Lesson 6 – Reflective Writing
o   Mirror exercise and reflection review / start Bio Blog essay
Lesson 7 – Movie Previews
o   write Bio Blog intro / movies as text
Lesson 8 – Post-Game Sports Re-Cap Report
o   write Bio Blog conclusion / quiz review / "Sports as text?"
Lesson 9 – You're On!
o   Quiz (5 Key Qs – reflection types) / publish blog pages
Lesson 10 – Reflecting the World
o   Social mirrors / “Is school a text?” / Cyber-Gallery Crawl






Differentiated Instruction
: Learners will need adjustments in the blog essay. Online access outside of class can be arranged. The delight and obvious danger of this unit plan is its multi-focus and many different activities. Some flattening and simplifying of the schedule may be needed if organization becomes an issue. Culturally, it may be best to stay with the vintage commercials and movies for as long as possible. The distance, I’m thinking, will free up discussion about ethnicity, gender and culture.

Special Resource Requirements: hand mirrors, Glogster and Blogger accounts

Materials – Unit Plan Forms: splash page, blog, Media Literacy Core Concepts chart, Five Key Questions, Expanded Questions, Media Literacy Quiz, teacher’s choice of media samples – paintings, vintage ads, magazine covers, CD covers, movie previews, TV commercials, sports post-game segment – preselected samples available online through my blog at:


Resources/Websites: examples of print and video advertisements
[www.creativity-online.com]

Center for Media Literacy

Viola Spolin exercises

Teaching for Joy and Justice by Linda Christensen at Rethinking Schools [www.rethinkingschools.org]


[http://www.blogger.com/]

CBS Sports Postgame Show




Wednesday, December 28, 2011

POP: Pathos - Speech Unit

Powers of Persuasion: Pathos

A Pop Literacies, Urban Middle School
Language Arts Unit Learning Plan






In this seven-lesson, multimedia, Language Arts unit – eighth grade urban learners encounter the power of persuasive speaking and expand their understanding of the concept of persuasion in advertising. Learners consider that effective speakers use volume, pacing, vocal inflection and word choice appropriate to audience. They evaluate how rhetoric designed for a target audience employs imagery and transfer to make appeals to emotion. Through questions concerning cultural perspective, learners also look at ways in which they themselves are a target audience, developing awareness of how the popular mass media maneuvers to persuade them as purchasers of products and consumers buying in to the cultural marketplace of ideas.

While this plan is a discrete, one-week unit, POP: Pathos is envisioned as the second part of a four-part series – not necessarily scheduled back-to-back -- investigating the three appeals identified by Aristotle in classical rhetoric: appeals to reason (logos), to emotion (pathos), and to the speaker’s authority (ethos). These persuasive text/pop media units would ultimately lead to a major final project where teams of learners would collaborate to prepare live multimedia presentations – expressing opinions on a social or cultural issue at play in Chris Crowe’s narrative non-fiction text, Getting Away with Murder: The True Story of the Emmett Till Case, or a similar work.

In this unit, learners will:

  •      Review and discover vocabulary associated with persuasive speaking and persuasive advertising techniques;

  •      Interpret their thoughts about various advertising images, symbols and slogans;

  •      Write and deliver a targeted ad voice-over using various learned techniques;

  •      Create a sound recording of a persuasive speech using Audacity software;

  •      Create a full-motion video clip and publish it using Animoto.com webware;

  •      Present targeted texts and assess why and how student ads are convincing.

Instructional Strategies: Lesson Two sequence is from Sullivan’s “Persuasive Speech” lesson – at Poway Schools, Powayusd.com. Lesson Three uses ideas and information from McCarthy’s “Persuasion through Advertising” lesson, located at Scholastic.com.

Big Idea: Cultural Perspective

Essential Questions:

  • What makes a good speaker?
  • What makes a persuasive speech?
  • For what purposes might an author create a persuasive speech?
  • How are images associated with emotions and feelings?
  • How are images used to persuade?
  • What is perspective?
  • What is cultural perspective?
  • What cultural perspectives do I identify with?
  • How do I deliver a spoken text convincingly?
  • What is a target audience?
  • What target audiences do I belong to?
  • How does intended audience affect word choice?
  • What shapes our point of view?
  • How do others influence our thinking?


Lesson Plan Overview

     Lesson 1 – POP Quiz
o   Web pretest. Review vocal speech techniques -- What makes a good speaker? - volume, pacing and vocal inflection. [What is perspective?]
     Lesson 2 – Commercial Properties
o   What makes a good speech? - word choice. Targeting audience. [How can persuasion skills be used to change perspective?]
     Lesson 3 – Target Audience: Pathos
o   Investigate the concepts of transfer and appeals to emotion. [What is cultural perspective?]
     Lesson 4 – The Write Angle
o   Vocabulary Quiz Bowl. Write text, make word choices, for advertisement voice-over. [What cultural perspectives do I share with others?]
     Lesson 5 – Speaking Engagement
o   Deliver and listen to voice-over speeches. [How does my worldview differ from the perspectives of others?]
     Lesson 6 – Power of Pictures
o   Vocabulary Quiz. Create sound file, choose picture files for voice-over and publish video [How do others influence my thinking?]
     Lesson 7 – Commercial Appeal
o   Presentation of final projects / evaluations. [How is my worldview shaped by the way the world views me?]



Learners: (based on a class from Patrick Henry High) 22 mixed ability students of widely diverse cultural backgrounds. Class has theoretically had a previous speech unit – POP: Logos – and some experience with the basic vocabulary associated with persuasive speaking, the delivery of brief speeches and solo readings, and manipulation of Audacity sound recording software and Animoto.com webware.

Duration: seven, 60-minute sessions

Special Resource Requirements: computer lab, Animoto.com account, Audacity software, examples of print and video advertisements from Creativity-Online.com

Materials – Unit Plan Forms: Target Audience, Picture–Symbol–Slogan map, Transfer Techniques, Voice-Over rubric, Persuasive Presentation rubric feedback form, web pretest, web POP Quiz, Vocabulary list for Quiz Bowl review

Resources/Websites: Animoto.com; sample adverts from [www.creativity-online.com];

“Persuasive Speech” lesson by April Sullivan [www.powayusd.com/pusdctae/exex/2009-products/Hospitality/ admin_powayusd_com_20090724_163000LessonPlan6.pdf].

“Persuasion through Advertising” lesson by Tara McCarthy at Scholastic.com [www.scholastic.com/teachers/lesson-plan/pictures-and-slogans-persuade-audience];



The three appeals identified by Aristotle in classical rhetoric;
appeals to reason (logos), to emotion (pathos), and to the speaker’s authority (ethos).



POP: Pathos
Core Learning Strategy Map

Standard: 8.9.3.3 Delineate and respond to a speaker’s argument, specific claim, and intended audience, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and relevance and sufficiency of the evidence and identifying when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Core Objective: I can determine a speaker’s target audience to evaluate a speech’s power and persuasiveness.
Learning Target: I can identify names of common vocal techniques used by speakers.
Learning Assessment: word splash, vocabulary quiz bowl
Learning Target: I can evaluate a persuasive spoken text.
Learning Assessment: two Voice-Over rubric forms – partner and self-assessment
Core Assessments: vocabulary POP Quiz - 20%;
six completed Persuasive Presentation Rubric feedback forms - 30%

Assessment Description: Just before learners partake in the unit’s final presentations, they will each be randomly assigned the names of six other students whose projects they will evaluate using the Persuasive Presentation rubric feedback form.

Standard: 8.9.4.4 Present claims and findings, respect intellectual properties emphasize salient points in a focused, coherent manner with relevant evidence, sound valid reasoning, and well-chosen details; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation

Core Objective: I can present my ideas clearly and convincingly to a target audience.
Learning Target: I can author a speech intended for a specific audience.
Learning Assessment: written text of advertisement voice-over
Learning Target: I can deliver a speech persuasively.
Learning Assessment: speech presentation of advertisement text
Learning Target: I can record a speech using standard software.
Learning Assessment: Audacity sound file of voice-over
Learning Target: I can create a full motion video using standard webware.
Learning Assessment: published Animoto.com video
Core Assessment: final presentation of published advertisement projects - 50%

Assessment Description: Learners will give a brief introduction and present a published 30-second Animoto.com video – for assessment of written text, *recorded speech, and multimedia elements.

*Based on evaluation of the initial speech presentations, this summative core assessment could be altered so that students would deliver speeches live as their Animoto media file’s music and images play. This would place a greater emphasis on public speaking -- if focus on that skill component is deemed necessary.



Success Opportunity for Urban LearnersSOUL Focus:
Comprehension, Collaboration and Presentation of Knowledge

 
ISTE NETS (National Educational Technology Standards) addressed:

Standard 1 - Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology.

Standard 6 - Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.


Differentiated Instruction: This multidimensional, multiliteracy unit dynamically aligns with several of the MDE’s Speaking Viewing, Listening, Media Literacy benchmarks for Grade 8 and should be fairly simple to adapt to suit all learners in an urban middle school program. For the final project, advanced learners could alternatively be invited to deconstruct a completed, previously published Animoto design and create new narration for a specific target audience – while differentiation for struggling learners might involve inviting students to work in pairs or shifting project length requirements.




Please note the name and acronym of the new heading listed under standards, representing my thought to include -- along with a state standard – an additional standard that specifically identifies the college and career readiness anchor area for inner-city students: Success Opportunity for Urban Learners SOUL Focus! This urban learning protocol -- based directly on the Common Core website’s CCR definitions – would be an instructional planning assessment tool and a guide to answering the question: “Why do we need to learn this?” My concept here is to energize the passive, academic CCR language so that urban students are explicitly instructed as to which of the basic, broad areas of life and learning skills are being addressed.